STOCKWELL LIDL's "NEWGATE" BRAND NAME IS OFF PUTTING. AND HOW!
LEFT CLICK to enlarge the LIDL November brand detail.
LEFT CLICK on the above NEWGATE PRISON
original artwork image to greatly enhance its detail.
Well as per above NEWGATE brand prison foods
just about stretched to
RATS and MICE.
Well 300 years ago that was the NEWGATE survival menu.
LIDL STOCKWELL obviously greatly digs the NEWGATE brand
and has on offer VEG and SOUPS and presumably they're
RATS and MICE free. Perhaps LIDL's overnight security staff keep
very very careful watch indeed.
For more info on NEWGATE historical menu's see
MAUREEN WALLER's well indexed volume
"1770 - SCENES FROM LONDON LIFE".
"BROWSER" THE BRIXTON BOOOKSHOP BEAUT'
ON DUTY YESTERDAY.
GIVE HIM A "LEFT CLICK"
FOR INCREASED VISIBILTY AND REALY ENJOY!!
A MILLION TIMES MORE CREDIBLE THAN THE
SO CALLED "BRIXTON POUND"
OR DELIBERATELY MIS-LABELLED
COMING UP SHORTLY JOANNA "DOG END" LUMLEY.
TIME OUT MAGAZINE "LACK OF WOMEN'S TOILETS" STRAIGHT-UP PISSTAKE.
To read this current LACK OF WOMEN'S PUBLIC TOILETS
TIME OUT "PISSTAKE" - LEFT CLICK once on the above image
and then LEFT CLICK a 2nd time to read the text easily.
The TIME OUT journalist IS making serious criticisms re
the lack of FEMALE provision. A problem which this blog
has been groaning on about now for 7 years or so.
You'd think that with a woman STOCKWELL LABOUR COUNCILLOR
namely useless IMOGEN WALKER
- SEE HERE
- she'd have seen
the STOCKWELL light by now but no chance -
NO WOMEN'S PUBLIC TOILETS PROVISION in STOCKWELL exists
and nor does it exist in CLAPHAM HIGH STREET.
What an utter crap LOCAL COUNCILLOR -
credit where its due namely that
her only consistancy is her total uselessness.
SeaWorld "BLACKFISH" FILM OMISSIONS! NAMELY "THE TILIKUM STARVATION TIT BITS TRAINING REGIME".
Without doubt this is a worthwhile well intentioned cinema production altho I do have certain strong misgivings that I intend to express below.
Towards the very end of this film which is about the disgusting murderous capture and unending incarceration of huge black whales (hence the film title) there is a particular sequence highlighted. This is when one long captured whale nicknamed TILIKUM
shown above and
- CLICK HERE
- turns on one of its so-called female "trainers"
and savages her fatally. In unpicking the alleged false original narrative given afterwards to this fatal event by SeaWorld
and the contemporary USA
media, the film for the first and pretty well the only film sequence points up that small dead fish were being singularly given to TILIKUM
whale AS IT PERFORMED
its various antics - obviously because the tit bits were an integral part of TILIKUM's
programmed captivity TRAINING
and action tactics.
However this film production very very surprisingly indeed gave absolutely NO FULL INFORMATION
about how the said WHALES
while in captivity for financial and entertainment purposes were actually TAUGHT TO PERFORM
their antics - this was a surprising omission given that there seemed no shortage of TRAINERS
of the WHALES WHILE IN CAPTIVITY.
We are talking here of "TRAINERS"
who have now in fact seen the light and who WITH THIS PRODUCTION
have decided to help end the BLACKFISH
in captivity industry. In the film on camera they seemed earnest enough on the face of it so why no information whatsoever on how these enormous whales were "trained"
(aka forced) to perform in ways and conditions that were absolutely not natural for them at all.
Not a single filmed ex trainer
- or the films producers - felt it worthwhile to explain how such creatures could HAVE BEEN MADE
to so perfom/ behave. Not a single clue. Well as I've written above in paragraph one perhaps just momentarily the film producers by implication did show a clue when they pointedly observed that TILIKUM WHALE'S
single tiny fish tit bit treats given singularly while actually performing
had pretty well run out when it TILIKUM
had decided to suddenly attack and kill one of its long established female trainers. That is the only moment on my recollecton when
>>> whale FEEDING while in captivity <<<
but it fails to tell the full story and state whether TRAINERS
were part and parcel of a tit bits starvation regime
which had helped to get the imprisoned whales to do their performance routines.
The film is earnest and very obviously well intentioned in the aspiration that enormous whales should not be captured and killed for entertainment purposes. But the so called entertainments which the whales peform are not normal whale antics and so how on earth are they got to learn and perform them? For a clue read on. What motivates the Whales???
The Whales are routinely starved and fed only during their routine training and performances because only if the starving creatures then do get their tit bits of food will they learn or perform the routines. Because of this the trainers know that this has been the case hands down. So why did non of those on the face of it coming clean in BLACKFISH
not absolutely point that out? Probably they did not voice these feeding/ starvation tactical processes because that would have so graphically showed how they too had been very very willing to coerce and starve the creatures until willy nilly they had a change of heart. So, why do I believe this - it is because my old Scottish father born in 1899 had in the early 1920's toured from Scotland throughout the UK, EUROPE
and the USA
with a Circus and helped with SEA LIONS
and other creatures and grew to absolutely detest Circus creature incarceration and until his death always absolutely swore that the creatures were only coerced to perfom because before so performing they were kept absolutely starved.
The above starvation aspect of BLACKFISH
torture and maltreatment was NOT
articulated in the BLACKFISH
film - very stringent criticisms of SeaWorld
itself were articulated but routine starvation of the WHALES
by their "seen the light" trainers was NOT
articulated. The film simply projects the general theme that the acquatic spacial enviroment for WHALES
is obviously too cruel and restrictive but the underlying STARVATION
of whales BY THEIR TRAINERS WAS NOT ARTICULATED.
Maybe they were too ashamed and it would have left them feeling less BIG HEARTED
after all. Most of the critics in the film were ex TRAINERS
so they well knew what was NOT
The current editon of the LAMBETH
freebee propaganda publication WEEKENDER
(1 Nov 2013) at page 3 (OPEN HERE AND SEARCH)
has a longish plug for the BLACKFISH
production claiming that the film does articulate the starvation shortcoming
- the film absolutely did not when I saw it at the BRIXTON RITZY
in the mid summer period
and subsequently I wrote to the film distributors
and got no acknowledgement of any kind. Maybe a distributor PR number
is now being articulated to cover the omission.
The purpose of this critique is NOT to suggest boycott this film -
it is to record a level of disappointment.
AN INTERESTING DECEMBER 2013 GUARDIAN FEATURE
ABOUT THE INFLUENCE OF THIS FILM PRODUCTION